Analysis unveils India's strategic choices in the Indo-Pacific, suggesting a balancing act between great powers.
In contemporary international relations, Indo-Pacific is a principal zone of strategic competition. In Xi Jinping’s New Era, China is transforming the dynamics of regional geopolitics. In this contest, India holds a pivotal position as an emerging power and a cautious middle power balancing strategic imperatives. Thus, this paper applies Complex Interdependence Theory (CIT) to dissect strategic options available for India in the Indo-Pacific. CIT posits that in international politics, there are various means to interact, there is a lack of issue hierarchy, and there is a limited role of military force. This argument provides a foundation to analyse India’s competing priorities. India’s relations in the security domain are visible through the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad), and it maintains economic interdependence with China. As a middle power, India’s strategy includes hedging, balancing, and diversification. India wants to avoid antagonising the United States and China and prioritises strategic autonomy. This would uplift India’s growing function as a norm-shaper and institutional broker in the changing Indo-Pacific.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prosper Malangmei (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: