Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The article examines the Digital Fairness Act's implications for influencer marketing across Europe, suggesting improvements for consumer protection.
The European Commission’s forthcoming Digital Fairness Act (DFA) seeks to modernise consumer protection in the digital economy by tackling a wide range of problematic online practicesincluding, but not limited to, dark patterns, addictive design features, exploitative targeted advertising, and influencer marketing. This article critically examines the emerging key elements of a future DFA, with a particular focus on its anticipated approach to influencer marketing and the challenge of crafting rules that are both specific and future-proof, capable of accommodating ongoing technological evolution and unforeseen trends. It begins by situating influencer marketing within the broader EU regulatory landscape, which is currently governed by a patchwork of legal instruments addressing consumer protection, digital services, audiovisual media, and e-commerce. Key frameworks include the Digital Services Act (DSA), the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (UCPD), the Directive on Electronic Commerce (e-Commerce Directive), the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and the Audiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD). Subsequently, through a comparative analysis of France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom, the article explores whether the DFA could draw on existing national regimes for influencer marketing to develop a coherent and adaptable EU‑wide framework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bertrand et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: