Comparative study reveals higher vitamin D deficiency and supplementation needs in type 1 gNET patients, implying tailored management is essential.
Background/Objectives: Type 1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors (gNET) arise in the setting of autoimmune chronic atrophic gastritis and secondary hypergastrinemia. Vitamin D deficiency (VDD) has been associated with bone impairment and adverse outcomes in patients with neuroendocrine tumor (NET); however, data specifically addressing gNET remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate vitamin D status, supplementation requirements, and bone involvement in patients with type 1 gNET compared with those with entero-pancreatic NET (EP-NET). Methods: This retrospective study included patients with type 1 gNET followed at a tertiary referral center between 2010 and 2025 and an age- and sex-matched EP-NET cohort. VDD prevalence, time and dose required for normalization, supplementation formulations, bone status, and dietary habits were analyzed. Results: Twenty-six patients were included (thirteen gNET and thirteen EP-NET). VDD was significantly more prevalent in the gNET group compared with the EP-NET group (92.3% vs. 46.2%, p = 0.03, OR: 14). gNET required significantly higher daily cholecalciferol doses (3198.9 ± 1629 vs. 1580 ± 1121 IU/day, p = 0.008) and more frequently required multiple supplementation formulations (38.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.04). Multivariable linear regression analysis restricted to VDD patients confirmed that gNET was independently associated with higher daily cholecalciferol dose requirements (p = 0.037). Bone impairment, defined as osteoporosis or osteopenia, was significantly more common in the gNET group (61.5% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.04, OR: 8.8). Dietary adherence did not differ between groups. Conclusions: Type 1 gNET show a higher burden of VDD, increased vitamin D supplementation requirements, and a higher prevalence of bone impairment compared with EP-NET, irrespective of dietary habits. These findings suggest disease-specific mechanisms and support the need for tailored management in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benevento et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: