During takeoff and landing, aircraft operate in a variety of situations, posing significant challenges to landing gear systems. Passive hydraulic–pneumatic dampers are commonly used in conventional landing gear to absorb impact energy and reduce vibration. However, due to their fixed damping characteristics and inability to adjust to changing operating conditions, these passive systems have several limitations. Recent research has focused on creating intelligent landing gear systems with magnetic dampers (MR) to overcome these limitations. By changing the magnetic field acting on the MR fluid, MR dampers provide semi-active control of the landing gear dynamics and adjust the damping force in real time. This flexibility reduces structural load during landing, increases riding comfort, and improves energy absorption efficiency. This study examines the current state of MR damper application for aircraft landing gear. The review categorizes current control techniques and highlights the structural integration of MR dampers in landing gear assemblies. Purpose: The magnetorheological (MR) damper has become a promising semiactive system to replace the conventional passive damper in aircraft landing gear. However, the mechanical structure and control strategy of the MR damper must be designed to be suitable for aircraft landing gear applications. Methods: Researchers have explored the potential structure designed, the mathematical model of the MR landing gear system, and the control algorithm that was developed for aircraft landing gear applications. Results: According to the mathematical model of the MR damper, three types of models, which are pseudo-static models, parametric models, and unparameterized models, are detailed with their application. Based on these mathematical models, many control algorithms were studied, from classical control, such as PID and skyhook control, to modern control, such as intelligent control and SMC control.
Quoc Viet Luong (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: