Qualitative case study reveals political displacement effects on minority communities in contested cities, indicating the need for urban democracy awareness.
This article examines the political displacement of minority communities in gentrifying neighborhoods within ethno-national contested cities. While prior research on gentrification-induced political displacement has primarily centered on class- and race-based marginalization in Global North cities, this study expands the analytical lens to contexts where gentrification is entangled with struggles over sovereignty, national identity, and territorial control. Using a qualitative comparative case study of Israeli mixed cities of Jaffa and Lydda, the research identifies four key expressions of political displacement efforts: (1) delegitimization of minority leadership and representation; (2) exclusion from decision-making and resources; (3) creation of exclusionary ethno-national institutions; and (4) nationalist demonstrations. The study reveals that political displacement in these contexts is not merely a byproduct of demographic change, but a mechanism of ethno-national domination. The study contributes a context-sensitive framework for understanding political displacement in divided/contested cities and highlights broader implications for urban democracy, minority agency, and conflict escalation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yael Shmaryahu-Yeshurun (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: