Retrospective analysis identifies risk factors for port skin erosion in oncologic patients, suggesting areas for preventive measures.
Background: Skin erosion over central venous access port (port skin erosion) is an uncommon complication; however, it usually necessitates port removal. This study retrospectively investigated risk factors for port skin erosion. Methods: A total of 3776 adult (⩾18 years) patients (male/female, 1841/1935; mean age, 60 years) who had ports placed at a single academic institution between January 2013 and January 2022 were included in the study. Of these, 3590 had a history of cancer, while 186 patients had a non-oncologic history. Port skin erosion was defined as a condition where any part of the port is exposed to ambient atmosphere through a breach in skin without clinical signs of local infection. Proportional subdistribution hazards regression analysis was conducted to elucidate risk factors for port skin erosion. Results: Cumulative follow-up period was 1,895,383 catheter-days (range 1–3405 days). A total of 45 patients (1.2%) had port skin erosion (rate 0.03/1000 catheter-days). The median time to port skin erosion was 188 catheter-days (range 32–1877 days). Multivariate analysis identified underweight (body mass index (BMI) < 18.5 kg/m 2 ) at the time of port placement (hazard ratio (HR) = 4.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.77–10.15, p = 0.001), use of a double lumen port (HR = 2.29, 95% CI = 1.18–4.48, p = 0.02), and central nervous system (CNS) malignancy (HR = 7.12, 95% CI = 2.19–23.19, p = 0.001) as significant risk factors for port skin erosion. Conclusions: Underweight patients (BMI < 18.5 kg/m 2 ), the use of a double lumen port, and CNS malignancy were independent risk factors for port skin erosion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wady et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: