This report audits relativistic field theories for the CST framework, highlighting their viability and implications.
The landscape of modern theoretical physics includes a vast arrayof relativistic field theories proposed as extensions to General Relativity(GR) or the Standard Model. While these models are phenomenologicallyattractive, many suffer from fundamental mathematical pathologies thatrender them physically nonviable. This report executes a comprehensiveaudit of candidate relativistic field theories suitable for the Causality-Stability Tester (CST) framework. We scrutinize scalar-tensor exten-sions (Galileons, DHOST), vector-tensor architectures (Proca, Einstein-Aether), and edge-case theories (Ghost Condensate, 4D Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet, ModMax) to determine their perturbative viability in the Minkowskilimit. We identify a clear hierarchy of candidates, distinguishing betweentheories that pass the CST gates, those that serve as stress tests, andthose that fail due to fundamental obstructions
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
SIKX HILTON (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: