Key result
Radiologic classification of primary hepatic angiosarcoma correlates with pathologic patterns, identifying ~77% as mass-forming.
Why the study?
No studies had examined the radiologic findings of primary hepatic angiosarcoma according to distinct histologic patterns.
Does radiologic classification correlate with histologic patterns in primary hepatic angiosarcoma?
Does radiologic classification correlate with histologic patterns in primary hepatic angiosarcoma?
Radiologic classification of primary hepatic angiosarcoma into mass-forming and non-mass-forming lesions closely corresponds to pathological classification.
Radiologic classification may inform histologic expectations in hepatic angiosarcoma; leaves open impact on prognosis or management.
Background/Objectives: To date, no studies have examined radiologic findings by histologic patterns of primary hepatic angiosarcoma; this study clarified radiologic findings of primary hepatic angiosarcoma according to distinct histologic patterns. Methods: From January 2010 to October 2024, 17 individuals (mean age, 69 years ± 11; 11 men) with pathologically confirmed primary hepatic angiosarcoma underwent computed tomography (CT) with or without magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Histologic patterns were classified as mass-forming, subdivided into vasoformative and non-vasoformative (epithelioid and spindled) patterns, or non-mass-forming, subdivided into sinusoidal and peliotic patterns. Two radiologists independently reviewed CT and MRI images, classifying lesions as non-mass-forming or mass-forming. Hypervascular portions and targetoid patterns were also assessed. Associations between histologic patterns and radiologic findings were evaluated using Fisher’s exact test. Results: Mass-forming tumors were observed in 13 individuals (76.5%), and non-mass-forming tumors in 4 individuals (23.5%). Significant correlation (p < 0.05) was found between radiologic classification (non-mass-forming or mass-forming) and corresponding pathologic patterns. Pathologic subdivision into vasoformative and non-vasoformative patterns did not correlate with hypervascular portions on imaging. Conclusions: Pathological classification into mass-forming and non-mass-forming patterns corresponds closely to radiologic classification of mass-forming and non-mass-forming lesions, indicative of strong pathologic features in imaging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question. Radiologic classification of primary hepatic angiosarcoma as mass-forming or non-mass-forming closely correlates with pathologic patterns, observed in 76.5% and 23.5% of cases, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: