PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 18, 2026Journal of Environmental Quality0 citations

Evaluating the fate and variability of soil organic carbon and nitrogen species under conservation practices in the Raccoon River Watershed

View Full Paper
ZZZhonglong ZhangMWMay Wu

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the fate and variability of soil organic carbon and nitrogen species under conservation practices.
  • Utilized the Soil and Water Assessment Tool–Carbon (SWAT‐C) for modeling
  • Calibrated the model with monitoring data for streamflow, sediment, and nutrient loads
  • Assessed impacts of no-till, residue harvest with cover crops, and without cover crops
  • SWAT‐C model showed satisfactory performance with efficiency values of 0.76–0.80
  • Several management practices significantly affected carbon and nitrogen loadings
  • Conservation practices potentially improve water quality and carbon sustainability

Abstract

Abstract This study evaluates the fate and variability of soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks and nitrogen species using the latest version of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool–Carbon (SWAT‐C) and assesses how conservation practices influence their dynamics in the Raccoon River Watershed (RRW). Dominated by intensive agricultural production, the RRW is a significant contributor of sediment and nutrient loads to local rivers and the Mississippi River. This SWAT‐C model simulates the export of SOC and nitrogen species and evaluates their responses under varying management scenarios. Model calibration was performed for streamflow, sediment, nitrate, total nitrogen, and organic carbon with monitoring data at both a sub‐basin and the watershed outlet. The SWAT‐C model achieved satisfactory to very good performance, with Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency values of 0.76–0.80, coefficients of determination ( R 2 ) of 0.78–0.86, and percent bias ranging from –18% to 12%. We assessed the effects of three conservation practices on SOC and nitrogen fate and transport: no‐till, residue harvest with cover crop implementation, and residue harvest without cover crops. The SWAT‐C results were compared with a historical baseline to quantify changes in the carbon and nitrogen loadings associated with each practice. This study highlights the role of conservation management and provides valuable insights for improving water quality and carbon sustainability in intensively farmed regions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696c7835eb60fb80d13966afhttps://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.70133
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Soil Organic Carbon Dynamics in Eroding and Depositional Landscapes2016 · 23 citations
  2. 2Baseflow contribution to nitrate-nitrogen export from a large, agricultural watershed, USA2004 · 211 citations
  3. 3Hydrologic and Water Quality Models: Performance Measures and Evaluation Criteria2015 · 2,704 citations
  4. 4HYDROLOGIC EVALUATION OF THE SOIL AND WATER ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR A LARGE TILE-DRAINED WATERSHED IN IOWA2006 · 195 citations
  5. 5Environmental and cost benefits of multi‐purpose buffers in an agricultural watershed for biomass production2021 · 12 citations