PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 18, 2026Biological Journal of the Linnean Society0 citations

Materiality and context of specimen labels: exposing frictions between local and global priorities in the preservation of ‘non-prototypical’ records

View Full Paper
TSThiago S R SilvaUniversity of Hong KongANAna Carolina A NeundorfUniversidade Federal do ParanáRFRodrigo M. FeitosaInternational Union for Conservation of Nature (United Kingdom)

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore how the materiality of specimen labels reflects social and historical frictions in biodiversity documentation.
  • Analysis of specimen label creation processes
  • Examination of the socio-cultural context of biodiversity documentation
  • Investigating institutional constraints on curation
  • Specimen labels show the physical demands of recorders and collectors
  • Materiality reflects the social struggles involved in biodiversity record-keeping
  • Institutional policies are influenced by the challenges in labeling and preserving records

Abstract

Abstract Specimen labels are frequently considered metadata by biologists worldwide, acquiring the form of a source of ‘primary biodiversity data’. Frequently, the materiality of specimen labels is considered problematic, given the difficulties in translating the data contained on them to machine-readable formats, possibly hampering the comparability of biological data. However, this framework frequently ignores the fact that the materiality of specimen labels is a manifestation of the historical and social frictions of the agents involved in documenting biodiversity. Here, we show how the materiality of specimen labels reflects the epistemic frictions of agents responsible for fieldwork and laboratory documentation. Our results show how the demands of recorders and collectors are frequently manifested physically during specimen label creation in different moments of its life-cycle, while exposing the socio-cultural struggles in preparing and preserving this type of record, and the institutional constraints in their curation, affecting policy-making at the institutional level.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Silva et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696c7835eb60fb80d1396746https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blaf115
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A global approach for natural history museum collections2023 · 168 citations
  2. 2Natural History Specimen Digitization: Challenges and Concerns2010 · 120 citations
  3. 3From Community-Based Resource Management to Complex Systems: The Scale Issue and Marine Commons2006 · 512 citations
  4. 4Concepts of Record (1): Evidence, Information, and Persistent Representations2007 · 145 citations
  5. 5The ABCD of primary biodiversity data access2012 · 72 citations