Slow responding in International Large-Scale Assessments (ILSAs) has received far less attention than rapid guessing, despite its potential to reveal heterogeneous response processes. Unlike disengaged rapid responders, slow responders may differ in time management, off-task behavior, or specific cognitive operations. This exploratory study uses sequence analysis of log-file data from a complex problem-solving item in PISA 2012 to examine whether slow responders can be grouped into homogeneous subtypes. The item required students to explore causal relations and externalize them in a diagram. Results indicate two distinct clusters among slow responders, each marked by characteristic interaction patterns and difficulties at different stages of the solution process. One cluster exhibited long pauses interspersed with repeated, inefficient attempts at representing causal relationships; the other showed shorter pauses coupled with inefficient exploratory actions targeting those relationships. These findings demonstrate that sequence analysis can parsimoniously identify clusters of action sequences associated with slow responding, offering a finer-grained account of aberrant behavior in low-stakes, digital assessments. More broadly, the approach illustrates how process data can be leveraged to differentiate mechanisms underlying slow response behaviors, with implications for validity arguments, diagnostic feedback, and the design of mitigation strategies in ILSAs. Directions for future research to better understand the differences among slow responders are provided.
Jerez et al. (Fri,) studied this question.