PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 18, 2026European Journal of Education5 citations

Trusting the Machine: How AI Assessment Feedback and AI Literacy Shape Students' Idea Implementation Skills

View Full Paper
AAAmjad Islam AmjadBSBisma Sajjad Sheikh

Key Points

  • The research aims to explore how AI assessment feedback, trust in AI, and AI literacy affect university students' idea implementation skills.
  • Descriptive survey design was employed.
  • Data collected from 486 university students.
  • Analysis focused on relationships among AI feedback, trust in AI, and idea implementation skills.
  • AI assessment feedback significantly enhances students' idea implementation skills.
  • Trust in AI partially mediates the relationship between AI feedback and idea implementation skills.
  • AI literacy contributes positively to idea implementation skills, but its interaction with AI feedback is not significant.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed higher education. The research shows that university students use AI and acquire academic ideas to develop innovative solutions to their problems. However, there is limited research on how AI feedback helps students improve their idea implementation. This study was rooted in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Social Cognitive Theory (SCT). The objective was to examine how the AI assessment feedback (AIAF), trust in AI (TAI) and AI literacy (AIL) influence university students' idea implementation skills (IIS). A descriptive survey design was used to collect data from 486 university students. The analysis revealed that AIAF significantly contributes to students' IIS at the university level. TAI was found to partially mediate the relationship between university students' AIAF and IIS. AIL was found to contribute to students' IIS individually. However, the interaction effect (AIAF*AIL) was not found to be a significant contributor to students' IIS. We found that the interplay among the study's variables (AIAF, TAI and AIL) positively enhances university students' IIS in solving their academic problems. It was recommended that students should use self‐regulated learning in AI feedback to improve their achievements. In addition, the current study has several practical, research and policy implications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Amjad et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696c79cde45ebfc9113cd428https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70457
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Artificial intelligence in academic literacy: empirical evidence on reading and writing practices in higher education2025
  2. 2Effect of Artificial Intelligence‐Based Tutoring, Cognitive Engagement, and Teacher Feedback on University Students' Academic Performance2026
  3. 3AI-enhanced feedback and its effects on student motivation, self-regulation, and learning outcomes in higher education2026
  4. 4Students’ Artificial Intelligence (AI) literacy: An exploratory study2026
  5. 5How does artificial intelligence literacy affect university students’ innovative behavior? A serial mediation analysis based on latent profiles2026 · 1 citations