This article explains quality control procedures for in-clinic veterinary analysers, highlighting implementation strategies and performance stability.
Background: In‐clinic laboratories may have little choice when it comes to quality control (QC) materials or robust recommendations for their use. This can lead to challenges regarding the application of QC for veterinary use and determining stable analytical performance. Aim of the article: This article aims to explain the principles of repeat patient testing quality control (RPT‐QC) and provides guidance for implementing RPT‐QC and generating QC limits for in‐clinic veterinary analysers. It also provides a standard operating procedure for processing RPT‐QC daily as a veterinary species‐specific QC and troubleshooting guidelines for unstable performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daly et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: