Key result
Bilateral carotid artery stenosis induces substantial cognitive impairment, led by radial arm maze deficits.
Meta-Analysis (n=56)
A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates cognitive tests detecting deficits in a mouse model, suggesting a need for broader cognitive evaluation.
Hypoperfusion via bilateral carotid artery stenosis is the most common mouse model of vascular cognitive impairment, but the literature varies surrounding which behavioural tests are most appropriate to detect cognitive deficits in this model. We aimed to address this via a systematic review and meta-analysis. We also aimed to provide a recommendation that also considers how the tests cover the different cognitive domains. We identified 1714 publications and extracted data from 56. Interestingly, only six cognitive behavioural tests were employed across the literature with the most common being the Morris water and radial arm mazes, followed by the Y maze, novel object recognition, open field, and the Barnes maze. While all examined tests were able to detect cognitive impairments in hypoperfused mice, there was a high degree of heterogeneity across the publications, highlighting that not all research groups consistently observed cognitive deficits in the model. There was also evidence of publication bias, and occasionally some publications with extremely high effect sizes were influential. We recommend all tests, but ideally experiments should be complemented with additional approaches that examine a greater range of cognitive functions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Padgett et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Vascular cognitive impairment (mouse model) (n=56). Bilateral carotid artery stenosis (BCAS) vs. Untreated sham, naïve or baseline was evaluated on Cognitive deficits measured by the radial arm maze (RAM) (Hedges G -1.29, 95% CI -1.68, -0.89). Bilateral carotid artery stenosis consistently induced cognitive impairments across multiple behavioral assessments, with the radial arm maze demonstrating the largest effect size (Hedges G -1.29).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: