PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 20, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Land Use Land Cover Change and its Implications for Livestock Production and Food Security in Kuyu District, Ethiopia

View Full Paper
TNTesfaye NegewoMMMessay MulugetaKGKumela Gudeta Gudeta

Key Points

  • This research aims to investigate how changes in land use and cover affect livestock production and food security in Kuyu district, Ethiopia.
  • Analyzed Landsat images from 1991 to 2021 for land use change mapping and classification using ArcGIS.
  • Conducted key informant interviews and focus group discussions for qualitative insights.
  • Utilized transect walks to gather additional data on local land use dynamics.
  • Cropland and bare land increased by 45.4% and 6.5%, respectively, over three decades.
  • Forest/plantation and grass/shrub land decreased by 29.3% and 23.7%, respectively.
  • Livestock relying on low-quality crop by-products showed poor health and production, threatening food security.

Abstract

Although Kuyu district has significant potential for animal-source food production due to its large livestock population and diverse species, the effects of land use and land cover (LULC) change on these resources remain underexplored. This study examines LULC changes over three decades (1991–2021) and their impact on livestock production and food security among rural households. Data from Landsat images from 1991, 2001, 2011, and 2021 were used to develop land use maps and quantify changes through visual interpretation and supervised classification using ArcGIS Version 10.7.1. Key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and transect walks were employed to complement the study with qualitative data. Six LULC classes were identified: forest/plantation, grass/shrub land, bare land, cropland, rural settlement, and urban built-up areas. Over the study period, cropland and bare land experienced net gains of 45.4% and 6.5%, respectively. In contrast, forest/plantation land and grass/shrub land showed net losses of 29.3% and 23.7%, respectively. The decline in grassland is a major cause of animal feed scarcity, although the expansion of croplands provides low-quality crop by-products as alternative feed sources. Livestock relying on such feeds exhibit poor production and health performance, jeopardizing food security for rural households. The LULC changes observed in this study underscore their adverse effects on livestock production. To mitigate the constraints on livestock production and improve food security, interventions such as diversifying livestock production, enhancing mixed crop-livestock farming, adopting agroecological practices, and implementing effective livestock development planning, policies, and strategies are recommended.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Negewo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696f1a849e64f732b51eec73https://doi.org/10.20372/ejed.v07i2.04
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper