PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 20, 20261 citations

Examining the Impact of Sustainable Value and Economic Value on TPASS Usage Intention

CHChun-Hua HsiaoCCCheng-Ping ChenHYHui-Chun Yang

Key Points

  • This study investigates the role of sustainable and economic values in shaping the intention to use TPASS (Taiwan's public transportation passes).
  • Integrated model based on value-attitude-behavior theory and theory of reasoned action
  • Online surveys conducted yielding 302 valid responses
  • Data analyzed using structural equation modeling
  • Sustainable and economic values significantly influence TPASS attitude
  • Economic value has a stronger effect than sustainable value on attitude
  • Attitude and subjective norms positively affect usage intention
  • Subjective norms show a notably stronger impact on usage intention

Abstract

As Taiwan faces the challenge of reducing per capita carbon emissions from 12 tons per year—twice the global average—to achieve the “net zero by 2050” goal, understanding the factors influencing the adoption of sustainable transportation becomes crucial. This study examines how sustainable value and economic value affect TPASS usage intention, using an integrated model based on the value-attitude-behavior theory and the theory of reasoned action. The model investigates how perceived economic value, perceived sustainable value, along with attitude and subjective norms, shape consumers’ intentions to use TPASS commuter passes. Data are collected through online surveys, yielding 302 valid responses, and analyzed using structural equation modeling. Results show that both sustainable and economic values significantly influence TPASS attitude, with economic value having a stronger effect. Furthermore, attitude and subjective norms both positively affect usage intention, with subjective norms demonstrating a notably stronger impact, providing insights for sustainable transportation policies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hsiao et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696f1a9f9e64f732b51eeeachttps://doi.org/10.46604/aiti.2026.15741
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evaluation of Sustainable Behavior and Acceptance of Electric Public Transportation: A Perspective from the Philippines2024 · 11 citations
  2. 2Promoting a sustainable behavioral shift in commuting choices: the role of previous intention and “personalized travel plan” feedback2024 · 20 citations
  3. 3Information Management of Low-Carbon Travel Behavior2024 · 2 citations
  4. 4Understanding Pro-Environmental Behavior in Sustainable Mobility: An Integrated Framework for Electric Vehicle (EV) Purchase Intentions2025 · 5 citations
  5. 5Impact of social-psychological factors on low-carbon travel intention: Merging theory of planned behavior and value-belief-norm theory2024 · 30 citations