Position paper proposes metacognition as interoception in cognition, suggesting new sensory insights for neuroscience.
This position paper proposes that metacognition—the capacity to monitor and evaluate one's own cognitive processes—may be better understood as a form of interoception rather than recursive cognition. Drawing on phenomenological reports from both historical figures and first-person experience, I argue that the brain possesses interoceptive capacity for its own processing states, which I term 'cognitive sense.' This hypothesis addresses a taxonomic gap in sensory modality classification and offers testable predictions for neuroscientific investigation. The paper incorporates critical distinctions between related phenomena (hyperphantasia vs. cognitive sense), linguistic evidence from cross-cultural idioms, and connections to synesthesia research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ryuhei ISHIBASHI (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: