Athletes with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy displayed less left ventricular hypertrophy (15.8±3.4 mm) and larger cavities than sedentary HCM patients (P < 0.001).
Does athletic status alter the electrical, structural, and functional cardiac phenotype in young patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy compared to sedentary patients?
Young athletes with HCM exhibit a distinct, milder structural and functional phenotype compared to sedentary HCM patients, making conventional echocardiographic differentiation from physiological LVH challenging in a subset of patients.
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
Background— The phenotype of individuals with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) who exercise regularly is unknown. This study characterized the clinical profile of young athletes with HCM. Methods and Results— The electrical, structural, and functional cardiac parameters from 106 young (14–35 years) athletes with HCM were compared with 101 sedentary HCM patients. A subset of athletes with HCM exhibiting morphologically mild (13–16 mm), concentric disease was compared with 55 healthy athletes with mild physiological left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). Most athletes with HCM (96%) exhibited T-wave inversion and had milder LVH (15.8±3.4 mm versus 19.7±6.5 mm, P 54 mm, 87% had a left atrium ≤40, and 100% had an E / E ′ <12. Conclusions— Athletes with HCM exhibit less LVH, larger left ventricular cavities, and normal indices of diastolic function compared with sedentary patients. Only a minority of athletes with HCM constitute the conventional gray zone of mild, concentric LVH. In this minority, conventional echocardiographic parameters alone are insufficient to differentiate HCM from physiological LVH and should be complemented by additional structural and functional assessments to minimize the risk of false reassurance.
Sheikh et al. (Wed,) reported a other. Athletes with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy displayed less left ventricular hypertrophy (15.8±3.4 mm) and larger cavities than sedentary HCM patients (P < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: