Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An agent architecture enhances travel planning by integrating symbolic translation and heuristic search approaches.
Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate outstanding capability in understanding natural language and show great potential in open-domain travel planning. However, when confronted with multi-constraint itineraries, personalized recommendations, and scenarios requiring rigorous external information validation, pure LLM-based approaches lack rigorous planning ability and fine-grained personalization. To address these gaps, we propose the Symbolic LoRA Travel Planner (SLTP) framework—an agent architecture that combines a two-stage symbol-rule LoRA fine-tuning pipeline with a user multi-option heuristic tree search (MHTS) planner. SLTP decomposes the entire process of transforming natural language into executable code into two specialized, sequential LoRA experts: the first maps natural-language queries to symbolic constraints with high fidelity; the second compiles symbolic constraints into executable Python planning code. After reflective verification, the generated code serves as constraints and heuristic rules for an MHTS planner that preserves diversified top-K candidate itineraries and uses pruning plus heuristic strategies to maintain search-time performance. To overcome the scarcity of high-quality intermediate symbolic data, we adopt a teacher–student distillation approach: a strong teacher model generates high-fidelity symbolic constraints and executable code, which we use as hard targets to distill knowledge into an 8B-parameter Qwen3-8B student model via two-stage LoRA. On the ChinaTravel benchmark, SLTP using an 8B student achieves performance comparable to or surpassing that of other methods built on DeepSeek-V3 or GPT-4o as a backbone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: