Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigation reveals co-infection increases avian influenza severity in SPF chicks, suggesting heightened risk factors.
Co-infection significantly influences disease severity. This study investigated the impact of co-infections with Escherichia coli (E. coli) O78 and Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG), alone and in combination, on the pathogenicity of lowpathogenic avian influenza H9N2 in specific pathogen-free (SPF) chickens. Seventy one-day-old SPF chicks were divided into seven equal groups (G), where G1 is the control one, G2-G4 were infected with H9, MG, and E. coli , respectively, and G5-G7 were co-infected with MG-H9, E. coli -H9, and MG- E. coli -H9, respectively. The study monitored clinical symptoms, mortality rates, H9N2 hemagglutination inhibition antibody titers, viral shedding through qRT-PCR, and histopathological changes in experimentally infected groups. The findings revealed that the group co-infected with all three pathogens had the highest significant mortality rate (70%), with severe clinical symptoms, moderate histopathological changes in the trachea and lungs, along with the highest significant hemagglutination inhibition antibody titers (6.40±0.52, 7.30±0.67 log2) at 7 and 14 days post-infection, respectively. This group also demonstrated the highest viral shedding (3.53±0.01, 4.53±0.09, 3.60±0.05 log10 EID 50 /ml) at 2, 4, and 7 days post-infection, respectively, with significant differences, and the longest duration of H9N2 shedding (10 days post-infection). In summary, co-infection enhanced the pathogenicity of H9N2; furthermore, co-infection with E. coli O78 increased H9N2 pathogenicity more than co-infection with M. gallisepticum , and the combination of both bacteria resulted in the highest pathogenicity of the H9N2 virus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yehia et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: