Systematic review and meta-analysis reveals AI models predict treatment response in neovascular AMD, suggesting potential for future use.
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of irreversible vision loss; anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is standard care for neovascular AMD (nAMD), yet treatment response varies. We systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) models using optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived information to predict anti-VEGF treatment response in nAMD. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore were searched from inception to 18 December 2025 for eligible studies reporting threshold-based performance. Two reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using PROBAST+AI; pooled sensitivity and specificity were estimated with a bivariate random-effects model. Seven studies met inclusion criteria, and six were synthesized quantitatively. Pooled sensitivity was 0.79 (95% CI 0.68–0.87), and pooled specificity was 0.83 (95% CI 0.62–0.94), with substantial heterogeneity. Specificity tended to be higher for long-term and functional outcomes than for short-term and anatomical outcomes. Most studies had a high risk of bias, mainly due to limited external validation and incomplete reporting. OCT-based AI models may help stratify treatment response in nAMD, but prospective, multicenter validation and standardized outcome definitions are needed before routine use; current evidence shows no consistent advantage of deep learning over engineered radiomic features.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: