Integrated analysis reveals conserved and species-specific metabolic responses to drought in various plants, indicating potential enhancement strategies.
Drought stress severely restricts plant growth and substantially reduces crop productivity. Although drought-response mechanisms have been extensively characterized within individual plant species, the conserved metabolic strategies shared across species remain insufficiently understood. To elucidate both conserved and species-specific metabolic mechanisms underlying drought adaptation, we performed an integrated transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis in rice, maize, and tomato. Profiling of 543 annotated metabolites revealed strikingly divergent baseline metabolic landscapes: tomato leaves were enriched in triglycerides and anthocyanins, whereas maize and rice accumulated higher levels of glycerophospholipids, tricin-derived flavonoids, and B vitamins. Under drought conditions, these differences were further reflected in the distinct sets of differentially accumulated metabolites (DAMs) detected in tomato (121), rice (98), and maize (94). Despite these species-specific signatures, we identified a conserved drought-responsive module consisting of five phenolamides that were consistently induced across all three species. Reconstruction of the associated regulatory network uncovered divergent enzymatic control strategies governing phenolamide biosynthesis: the drought-induced BAHD acyltransferases OsPHT4 in rice and SlPHT3 in tomato exhibited broad-spectrum catalytic activities, whereas the maize homolog ZmPHT4 fulfilled a similar biosynthetic role through constitutive, non-drought-inducible activity. Together, this study provides a comprehensive metabolic framework for plant drought response and demonstrates that extensive species-specific metabolic architectures and transcriptional regulatory divergence coexist beneath a conserved core metabolomic response, offering promising targets for the precise genetic enhancement of crop drought tolerance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: