Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A randomized control trial demonstrates improved leadership outcomes in social welfare practitioners, suggesting effective training impacts.
Purpose This study evaluates the Jockey Club InnoPower Social Welfare Fellowship Program, designed to strengthen adaptive leadership among Hong Kong's social welfare practitioners who face high turnover and organizational instability. Method : A randomized waitlist control trial (23 training, 39 control) was conducted. Quantitative effects on sense of community, leadership, self-efficacy, adaptive capacity, and innovation were analyzed using Bayesian difference-in-differences (DID) and seemingly unrelated regression (SUR). Qualitative data from individual and focus group interviews were thematically analyzed. Results Bayesian DID showed significant improvements in all outcomes, with small-to-large effect sizes (≥95% probability of positive effects). SUR confirmed robust post-training effects ( p < .001). Qualitative findings indicated that the program fostered transformative journeys from individual growth to sector-wide impact and acted as a catalyst for organizational resilience, innovation, and systemic change. Conclusion The study highlights adaptive leadership as a critical approach for strengthening organizational resilience in Hong Kong's social welfare sector.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ngai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: