PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2026Journal of Systematics and Evolution0 citations

Environmental DNA reveals multi‐trophic biodiversity patterns and community assembly mechanisms across contrasting river systems on the Qinghai–Xizang Plateau

View Full Paper
QLQi LuSZSi‐Yu ZhangJDJianqing Du

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand biodiversity organization and community assembly in river ecosystems of the HKH region using environmental DNA techniques.
  • Conducted eDNA metabarcoding targeting cyanobacteria, diatoms, invertebrates, and vertebrates.
  • Assessed biodiversity in two alpine river systems: Yellow River (YR) and Nujiang River (NJ).
  • Evaluated α and β diversity, species turnover, and the influence of environmental factors on communities.
  • Identified 1695 operational taxonomic units across both river systems.
  • Observed higher α diversity in NJ for phototrophs and invertebrates, and greater richness of vertebrates in YR.
  • Found stochastic community assembly processes predominating in both rivers, with deterministic processes more significant in YR.

Abstract

Abstract The Hindu Kush Himalayan (HKH) region sustains the headwaters of major Asian rivers and harbors unique alpine biodiversity, and yet, it is highly sensitive to climate change. Biodiversity organization and community assembly processes across trophic levels within its river ecosystems remain poorly understood. Here, we used multi‐marker environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding targeting four biological groups (cyanobacteria, diatoms, invertebrates, and vertebrates) to assess multi‐trophic biodiversity patterns in two alpine rivers of the region: the Yellow River source region (YR) and the middle–upper Nujiang River (NJ). These two systems differ markedly in geography, hydroclimate, vegetation, and human disturbance intensity. We identified 1695 operational taxonomic units and revealed pronounced differences in biodiversity pattern and community composition between rivers. Phototrophs and invertebrates showed higher α diversity in NJ, whereas vertebrates were richer in YR. β diversity was mainly driven by species turnover in both rivers, with a stronger distance–decay pattern in YR. Correlations between environmental variables and α and β diversity varied across groups and rivers, with geographic and climatic factors exerting stronger effects in NJ. iCAMP and pNST analyses revealed that stochastic processes dominated community assembly in both rivers, whereas deterministic processes were relatively stronger in YR compared to NJ. Accordingly, co‐occurrence networks revealed cohesive communities in YR but more modular ones in NJ, indicating contrasting ecological stability regimes. Overall, our study provides an integrated, multi‐trophic perspective on how environmental gradients shape riverine biodiversity and ecological interactions, informing adaptive conservation strategies under accelerating environmental change in the HKH region.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971bd26642b1836717e1dc6https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.70049
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper