Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pilot validation investigates acute effects of a pneumatic robot on finger rehabilitation in stroke survivors, suggesting varying outcomes by impairment level.
Pneumatic soft robotic devices are emerging as promising tools for assisting hand rehabilitation in individuals with post-stroke motor impairment. However, evidence regarding their immediate functional impact remains limited, particularly across different impairment levels. This study presents a pilot validation of the YAD_V2 pneumatic finger rehabilitation robot and evaluates acute changes in finger range of motion (ROM) and task performance during a single intervention session. Twenty stroke participants were categorized into two groups based on the Fugl-Mayer Hand sub score: severe impairment (FMA-Hand < 10) and mild-to-moderate impairment (FMA-Hand ≥ 10). ROM was measured using integrated bending sensors during voluntary flexion–extension before, during, and after a 10-min pneumatic actuation session. A mixed 2 × 3 repeated-measure ANOVA revealed a significant Group × Time interaction (F(2, 36) = 4.628, p = 0.016, partial η2 = 0.205). In the severe group, ROM increased from 8.53° to 28.46° during actuation (p = 0.002), and partially returned to baseline afterward. In the mild–moderate group, no significant ROM changes were observed; however, cube-transfer time improved significantly (mean improvement: 0.88 s, p = 0.039). These findings indicate that pneumatic assistance induces distinct acute effects depending on impairment severity. This study provides preliminary evidence supporting the feasibility of the YAD_V2 robotic system and highlights the need for multi-session clinical trials to determine therapeutic efficacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: