Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental and numerical investigation reveals lift enhancement in micro air vehicles, suggesting efficient design strategies.
Efficient lift generation under limited geometric scale and flapping frequency remains a central challenge for hovering flapping-wing micro air vehicles (FWMAVs). Although the clap-and-fling mechanism is known to enhance lift, its full-span implementation in existing two-wing and four-wing configurations often induces strong drag impulses and high energy consumption, while experimental investigations of localized clap-and-fling interactions in realistic three-dimensional four-wing systems remain scarce. In this study, a wing-tip partial clap-and-fling mechanism is experimentally and numerically investigated using a four-wing hovering FWMAV with an adjustable fore–hind wing phase difference. A single-motor-driven four-wing platform with a spatial five-link transmission is developed to realize controllable phase coordination between the fore and hind wings. Force measurements, smoke-flow visualization, and three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics simulations are performed to compare a wing-tip partial clap-and-fling condition (φ = 180°) with a non-interacting baseline (φ = 0°) at Re ≈ 2 × 104. The results show that the localized wing-tip interaction increases the mean lift by 14.3% in experiments and 17.9% in simulations, while inducing only a moderate drag increase. Flow-field analysis reveals that the lift enhancement is primarily driven by a sustained leading-edge vortex system formed through localized gap-jet-induced vortex interaction and delayed trailing-edge vortex shedding, which prolongs the low-pressure region over the wing surface. By confining wing–wing interaction to the outer-span region, the wing-tip partial clap-and-fling mechanism provides an efficient and controllable lift-augmentation pathway, offering new aerodynamic insights for phase-coordinated design of low-Reynolds-number multi-wing FWMAVs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: