PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2026International Journal of Molecular Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Circulating Naïve Regulatory T Cell Subset Displaying Increased STAT5 Phosphorylation During Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation Is Associated with Clinical Pregnancy and Progesterone Levels

View Full Paper
KRKsenija RakićAGAleš GoropevšekNKNejc Kozar

Key Points

  • This study aims to explore the relationship between peripheral blood Treg levels and implantation success during assisted reproductive cycles.
  • Conducted a prospective observational study in women undergoing IVF/ICSI and natural cycle FET.
  • Collected peripheral blood samples on the day of embryo transfer.
  • Analyzed Treg subpopulations using 13-colour flow cytometry.
  • Assessed STAT5 signaling in Tregs via phospho-specific flow cytometry.
  • Measured serum hormone levels including progesterone and AMH in parallel.
  • Significant differences in Treg subpopulation distributions were observed between women who conceived and those who did not.
  • Higher frequencies of naïve CXCR5− Tregs were associated with successful clinical pregnancies and correlated with serum progesterone levels.
  • Naïve Treg frequency and STAT5 signaling in Tregs linked to AMH levels, indicating a connection between ovarian reserve and Treg homeostasis.

Abstract

Regulatory T cells (Tregs), particularly their phenotypically distinct subpopulations, are critical for the establishment of maternal immune tolerance during embryo implantation. Despite advances in assisted reproductive technologies, implantation failure remains a frequent and often unexplained clinical challenge. Variations in Treg frequency and phenotype have been proposed to influence implantation success, particularly under differing hormonal conditions. This study aimed to investigate peripheral blood Treg levels and their subpopulations on the day of blastocyst transfer in both stimulated in vitro fertilization (IVF/ICSI) cycles involving controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) and true natural cycles with frozen embryo transfer (FET), and to examine their associations with systemic hormone levels and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH). A prospective observational study was conducted including women undergoing IVF/ICSI with fresh embryo transfer (ET) and women undergoing natural cycle FET. Peripheral blood samples were collected on the day of ET and analyzed using 13-colour flow cytometry, enabling detailed subdivision of Tregs into multiple subpopulations based on the expression of differentiation and chemokine markers, including CXCR5. In addition, because common γ-chain cytokines may influence pregnancy success by modulating the balance between suppressive Treg and non-Treg subsets, intracellular STAT5 signaling was assessed using phospho-specific flow cytometry. Serum estradiol, progesterone, FSH, LH, and AMH levels were measured in parallel. Significant differences were observed in Treg subpopulation distributions between women who conceived and those who did not. Higher frequencies of naïve CXCR5− Tregs were associated with clinical pregnancy, independent of age, and correlated with serum progesterone levels. Moreover, both naïve Treg frequency and enhanced IL-7-dependent STAT5 signaling in naïve Tregs from women undergoing COH were associated with AMH levels, suggesting a link between ovarian reserve and Treg homeostasis mediated by signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 (STAT5) signaling. In conclusion, Treg subpopulations, particularly CXCR5− naïve Tregs, appear to play a central role in implantation success following ET. Their distribution differs between stimulated and natural cycles and is influenced by systemic progesterone levels and STAT5 signaling. These findings suggest that peripheral Treg profiling may represent a potential biomarker of implantation competence and could inform personalized approaches in assisted reproduction.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rakić et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971bdcf642b1836717e275fhttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27020922
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper