This article explores visual narratives in post-crisis Somalia, highlighting local resilience versus international bias.
This article explores how multimodal media environments visually frame Somalia’s post-crisis narrative, examining the contrast between local and international representations. Somalia’s compounded crises – civil war, environmental challenges and political instability – have often led to skewed portrayals in traditional western media, which frequently reinforce negative stereotypes of a failed, conflict-ridden state. In response, this study analyses visual content from a Somali social media influencer, a local news platform and an international media outlet. The findings reveal that while local media and influencers emphasize peace, resilience and renewal, international outlets often maintain a conflict-focused narrative that perpetuates outdated biases. The research highlights how social media offer alternative visual frames that showcase Somalia’s pre-conflict peace and potential for recovery, underscoring the importance of constructive journalism that fosters hope, empathy and post-crisis renewal. We illustrate how visual frames can either hinder or support Somalia’s journey toward renewal and rebuilding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Omondi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: