Retrospective study shows high diagnostic accuracy for rare diseases in emergency department, suggesting clinical utility.
Aim: Evaluataion of the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of the Medicine GPT model in identifying and managing rare diseases in the emergency department. Materials and methods: A retrospective study was conducted using 100 published rare case reports retrieved from PubMed. Cases were selected based on three common complaints: chest pain (n = 50), abdominal pain (n = 30), and shortness of breath (n = 20). Each case’s clinical presentation was input into Medicine GPT, which then generated a leading diagnosis. The primary outcome was the proportion of correct diagnoses. Cohen’s Kappa (κ) was calculated to determine inter-rater reliability. Diagnostic accuracy varied by symptom category: chest pain (92%, κ = 0.84), abdominal pain (87%, κ = 0.81), and shortness of breath (90%, κ = 0.875). Based on full clinical presentations, overall diagnostic agreement reached 90% (κ = 0.84), indicating substantial to almost perfect consistency. Conclusions: Medicine GPT demonstrated substantial diagnostic accuracy for rare emergency department presentations, indicating potential to enhance clinical decision-making. It may serve as a foundation for refining future AI models in real-world settings, but always should remain only as an assistive tool for professional clinical judgment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Obeid et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: