Background/Objectives: Sepsis is a critical medical emergency with significant morbidity and mortality, particularly in resource-limited countries. Effective strategies are essential to lower the high death rate. The sepsis code protocol recommends coordinated, structured, and prompt interventions for thorough patient care. This study aimed to compare in-hospital mortality rates after implementing the Sepsis Code protocol with those of a cohort of patients previously treated according to standard institutional guidelines. Methods: A pilot quasi-experimental study using a historical cohort design was conducted, involving patients with sepsis treated in an emergency department. Bivariate and multivariate analyses, as well as survival analysis, were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention. Results: A total of 342 patients were analyzed. Among those who received the intervention, mortality was 13.4%, while in the control group, it was 22.5% (p = 0.042). Additionally, a protective association was found between the intervention and mortality (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29–0.94). Factors associated with increased mortality risk included lactate levels, SOFA score, septic shock presence, and history of diabetes. Conclusions: The implementation of the Sepsis Code in the emergency area showed an association with lower in-hospital mortality, especially in patients with septic shock. However, due to the study’s design, further research is needed to employ more robust methodologies and confirm the protocol’s applicability in the region.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
German Devia Jaramillo
Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá
Laura María Castillo Morales
Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá
Camilo Antonio Vega Useche
Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Universidad del Rosario
Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jaramillo et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6971be8d642b1836717e3260 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020767