PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2026ChemCatChem1 citations

Sulfur Oxidation Unlocks Ene‐Reductase Catalysis for Stereoselective C(sp 3 )–S(VI) Bond Formation in β‐Sulfone‐carboxylic Acid Esters

View Full Paper
AMAriane MattanaLRLaura Rodríguez‐FernándezFZFei Zhao

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore how sulfur oxidation can enable stereocontrolled C(sp3)–S bond formation using biocatalysts.
  • Utilized the biocatalyst ENE-101 for the reduction of β-vinyl sulfones.
  • Performed computational studies to analyze substrate interactions and electrophilicity.
  • Assessed the enantioselectivity and yield of the C(sp3)–S bond formation.
  • Achieved over 99% enantiomeric excess in C(sp3)–S bond formation.
  • Showed that β-vinyl sulfides were unreactive, suggesting specificity for β-vinyl sulfones.
  • Established that sulfur(VI) oxidation significantly enhances alkene reactivity and substrate binding.

Abstract

ABSTRACT The enantioselective construction of C(sp 3 )─S stereocentres remains a major challenge in catalysis due to the distinct electronic and steric features of sulfur, compared to oxygen or nitrogen atoms, which complicate both stereocontrol and configurational stability at the C─S bond. Here, we report that the ene‐reductase biocatalyst ENE‐101 catalyses the highly enantioselective reduction of β‐vinyl sulfones, enabling the direct formation of C(sp 3 )–S(VI) stereocentres in excellent yields and enantiomeric excesses (up to >99% ee). Whereas the corresponding β‐vinyl sulfides are unreactive towards ENE‐101, the S(II) to S(VI) oxidation activates the C═C bond toward enzymatic reduction. Computational studies reveal that the sulfone moiety enhances alkene electrophilicity and promotes favourable substrate orientation and binding within the ENE‐101 active site. The biocatalyst exhibits broad substrate scope, tolerating diverse β‐vinyl sulfones. This work establishes sulfur(VI) activation as an effective strategy to expand the reactivity landscape of ene‐reductase biocatalysts for the asymmetric C─S bond formation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mattana et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971be8d642b1836717e330dhttps://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.202501595
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cooperative chemoenzymatic and biocatalytic cascades to access chiral sulfur compounds bearing C(sp3)–S stereocentres2024 · 11 citations
  2. 2Brønsted Acid-Assisted Zinc-Catalyzed Markovnikov-Type Hydrothiolation of Alkenes Using Thiols2020 · 36 citations
  3. 3The ORCA program system2011 · 13,470 citations
  4. 4Radical C(sp 3 )–H alkenylation, alkynylation and allylation of ethers and amides enabled by photocatalysis2017 · 124 citations
  5. 5Synthesis of Deuterium-Labeled Derivatives of Dimethylallyl Diphosphate2006 · 36 citations