Nurses experience some barriers to healthy eating and weight loss that are different than the general population. This study examined diet timing and quality, and interest in time-restricted feeding (TRF), and compared diet quality between day and shift-working nurses. The cross-sectional SHift-working Investigation of Fasting Time and Diet Study was conducted among nurses (n = 123) in the United States. Diet was tracked for up to 7 days using the ASA24 to determine Energy-density Dietary Inflammatory Index (E-DIITM) scores, Heathy Eating Index (HEI), and fasting duration. Self-reported demographics, psychosocial measures (e.g. stress and depression), and TRF anticipated barriers and facilitators were obtained. Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to compare night/rotating and dayshift. The primarily white (86%) and female (95%) participants had a mean age and body mass index (BMI) of 34.1 ± 10.0 years and 27.3 ± 5.6 kg/m2, respectively. Most participants (75%) expressed interest in TRF. Fasting duration was short (mean hours = 11.9), and diet quality poor (mean: E-DII score = −0.05; HEI score = 54.0). Night/rotating shift had more anti-inflammatory diets compared to dayshift (mean E-DII: night/rotating = 0.19 vs dayshift = 1.21; p = 0.04). Nurses have challenging barriers to improving weight. Since most nurses indicated interest in a TRF intervention, TRF may hold potential as a key dietary approach for nurses.
Farrell et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: