PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2026Materials1 citationsOpen Access

Effect of Post-Printing Methods on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Ti6Al4V Titanium Alloy Samples Fabricated Using Laser Powder Bed Fusion

View Full Paper
KŻKrzysztof ŻabaSRStanislav RuszAHAlicja Haslik-Sopata

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate how different post-printing methods affect the microhardness and microstructure of Ti6Al4V titanium alloys.
  • Utilized laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) for fabrication of Ti6Al4V samples.
  • Applied hot isostatic pressing (HIP) at various temperatures (910 °C, 1150 °C, 1250 °C).
  • Conducted annealing at 1020 °C and twist channel angular pressing for post-processing.
  • Analyzed the effects of printing orientation on microhardness and microstructure.
  • Observed higher microhardness in samples oriented perpendicular to the printing direction.
  • Identified precipitation of fine α particles in the β phase during annealing, contributing to stronger alloys.
  • Noted significant differences in microhardness based on printing orientation and HIP parameters.
  • HIP resulted in improved homogenization and defect reduction in the microstructure.

Abstract

Laser powder bead fusion (LPBF) allows for the fabrication of highly accurate components from metal powders, which is difficult to achieve using traditional methods. LPBF-produced components can be characterized by their porosity and unfavorable microstructure, making further processing difficult. Therefore, appropriate post-printing methods are crucial, as they reduce porosity, reduce residual stresses, and stabilize the microstructure. The aim of this paper was to determine the effect of post-printing methods on the microhardness and microstructure of Ti6Al4V titanium alloy samples fabricated using the LPBF process in different orientations. Hot isostatic pressing (HIP) at various temperatures (910 °C, 1150 °C, 1250 °C), annealing at 1020 °C, and twist channel angular pressing using a 90° channel ending with a helical exit were considered postprocessing methods for LPBF-produced samples. Printing orientation significantly determined the effectiveness of HIP and the heat treatment processes. Higher microhardness was observed on the cross-section oriented perpendicular to the 3D printing direction. Annealing under appropriately selected conditions favors the precipitation of fine particles of the α phase in the β phase, leading to a strengthening effect by precipitation. Based on the microhardness measurements, clear differences were observed in the mean values, statistical ranges, and result distributions depending on the printing plane, HIP process parameters, and the use of an additional heat treatment. The HIP process leads to a more pronounced homogenization of microstructure and defect reduction, with the morphology of the microstructure and microhardness distribution dependent on the HIP process temperature.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Żaba et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971bfdff17b5dc6da021f03https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19020401
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper