PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2026Journal of Crohn s and Colitis0 citations

P0078Prostaglandin D2 and modulation of transepithelial permeability in Ulcerative Colitis: mechanistic insights

View Full Paper
VAV AbruzzeseMCM Casado-BedmarPMP Myrelid

Key Points

  • To investigate the role of prostaglandin D2 in modulating transepithelial permeability in ulcerative colitis.
  • Conducted ex vivo studies using colonic mucosal biopsies from ulcerative colitis patients and healthy controls.
  • Measured transepithelial permeability in Ussing chambers with and without PGD2 treatment.
  • Assessed protein expression levels of PGD2 receptors in biopsies via western blot analysis.
  • Evaluated mucosal mast cell infiltration and receptor expression using immunofluorescence.
  • Leveraged an in vitro Caco-2 model to study effects of PGD2 on permeability.
  • Reduced expression of PGD2 receptors DP1 and DP2 in ulcerative colitis biopsies compared to controls.
  • Increased mast cell count in ulcerative colitis biopsies, with more cells expressing DP2 receptors.
  • PGD2 treatment increased paracellular permeability in control biopsies but decreased transcellular permeability in ulcerative colitis biopsies.
  • In inflamed Caco-2 monolayers, PGD2 increased both paracellular and transcellular permeability.
  • PGD2 did not initiate mast cell degranulation but inhibited it when pre-treated before another stimulus.

Abstract

Abstract Background Disruption of the epithelial barrier is a key event in Ulcerative Colitis (UC) pathogenesis, leading to an increase in intestinal permeability and sustained mucosal inflammation. Prostaglandin D2 (PGD2), a member of the eicosanoid family of lipid mediators, is mainly released by mast cells (MC), known to be involved in UC inflammation. While biological effects of PGD2 could have a profound influence on many regulators of intestinal permeability, the evidence linking its activity to the pathogenesis of UC is still limited and conflicting. In order to address this gap in our understanding of the disease, we performed a series of ex vivo and in vitro studies. Results strongly suggest a complex and somewhat unexpected role of PGD2 Methods Colonic mucosal biopsies were obtained from 8 patients with UC and 8 healthy controls. Biopsies were mounted in Ussing chambers and transepithelial permeability was measured with or without treatment with PGD2 or MC degranulator A23187. Protein expression levels of PGD2 receptors PTGDR (DP1) and CRTH2 (DP2) in colon biopsies were measured by western blot. Mucosal infiltration of MC was assessed by counting the number of MC tryptase positive cells by immunofluorescence, while percentage of MC expressing DP1 and DP2 receptors was evaluated from double-staining with MC tryptase and each receptor separately. An in vitro model of Caco-2 was used to assess the effect of PGD2 on permeability in presence or absence of inflammation. Finally, the effect of PGD2 on MC activity was assessed by measuring the release of beta-hexosaminidase in human MC line HMC1 Results DP1 and DP2 expression was reduced in UC compared to control biopsies. The number of MC was increased in UC biopsies, together with the fraction of cells expressing DP2 receptor. In ex vivo experiments, PGD2 caused an increase in paracellular permeability in control biopsies and a decrease in transcellular permeability in UC biopsies. In in vitro experiments, PGD2 treatment caused an increase in both paracellular and transcellular permeability in inflamed model of Caco2 monolayer. PGD2 alone did non cause any effect on HMC1 degranulation, but was able to reduce HMC1 degranulation when added before A23187 treatment Conclusion Results support a role of PGD2 in the modulation of colonic mucosal permeability. However, the overall effect might be complex, considering that many cell types involved in the barrier function of the colonic mucosa express PGD2 receptors. Altogether, this study could have implication in both pathophysiology and future targeted treatments of UC Conflict of interest: Abruzzese, Vittorio: No conflict of interest Casado-Bedmar, Maite: No conflict of interest Myrelid, Pär: No conflict of interest Haapaniemi, Staffan: No conflict of interest Söderholm, Johan D.: No conflict of interest Keita, Åsa: No conflict of interest

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Abruzzese et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69730eabc8125b09b0d1e7d7https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf231.259
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper