Theoretical study reveals how hyperconjugation affects tin-carbon coupling in organostannanes, indicating new predictive frameworks.
One-bond ¹¹⁹Sn-¹³C couplings in organostannanes are sensitive to local stereoelectronic effects, yet quantitative rules linking hyperconjugation to ¹J(Sn-C) remain limited, especially at anomeric centers. We combine DFT studies with NBO analysis across 77 cyclic scaffolds, including matched axial/equatorial (α/β) anomeric pairs, to relate antiperiplanar donor → σ*(C-Sn) delocalization to ¹J(Sn-C). Validation against ¹J(C-H) benchmarks reproduces Perlin-type axial/equatorial differences and the classical reversal in 1,3-dithianes. ¹J(Sn-C) scales with the magnitude of donation. Pairwise comparisons are equally diagnostic: across 27 α/β (axial/equatorial) pairs, equatorial isomers show larger couplings in 92% of cases, and ΔJ correlates with Δdonation, rationalizing the β > α hierarchy. Ring-size controls reveal a geometric signature consistent with known ring size relationships with coupling constants: as the size of the ring increases, ¹J(C-H) decreases. Incorporation of sulfur in the ring can cause the β > α ¹J(Sn-C) behavior observed in most other cyclic scaffolds to invert with axial ¹J(Sn-C) being greater than equatorial ¹J(Sn-C). A single-parameter empirical scaling (J(corr) = -1.419·J(calc)) improves absolute agreement with experiment without perturbing trends and brings negative calculated ¹J(Sn-C) to the experimentally derived positive ¹J(Sn-C). Collectively, these results deliver a practical, mechanistic framework for predicting tin-carbon coupling constants and assigning the anomeric configuration in anomeric organotin compounds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
FISCH et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: