PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2026Asian Spine Journal3 citationsOpen Access

Comparison of biportal versus uniportal endoscopic decompression for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta‑analysis

View Full Paper
AYAlexander YuMKMark KurapattiRHRyan Hoang

Key Points

  • The research aims to compare the postoperative outcomes of biportal versus uniportal endoscopic surgeries for lumbar degenerative disease.
  • Conducted a systematic review
  • Performed meta-analysis of existing studies
  • Compared outcomes including operative time and recovery
  • Assessed improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
  • Postoperative outcomes are comparable between both techniques
  • Biportal surgery showed a modest but non-significant benefit in ODI improvement
  • Uniportal surgery was more efficient in terms of reduced operative time and quicker recovery

Abstract

Both uniportal and biportal endoscopic spine surgeries yield comparable postoperative outcomes in LDD. Although biportal surgery showed a modest advantage in ODI improvement, it did not reach the minimal clinically important difference. Uniportal surgery demonstrated greater efficiency in terms of operative time and recovery, particularly for discectomy procedures.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69730f34c8125b09b0d1f0cbhttps://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2025.0104
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper