A proof-of-concept trial assesses UC-TREAT diet effects on gut microbiome in adults with quiescent ulcerative colitis, suggesting beneficial changes.
Background Microbiome modifying treatments show potential in favourably influencing outcomes of patients with mild-moderate Ulcerative Colitis (UC). In a proof-of-concept study, we tested the gastrointestinal tolerability of a novel, “eubiotic” diet (UC-TREAT), and assessed its effects on the gut microbiome and short chain fatty acid (SCFA) production in individuals with UC and healthy controls (HC). Methods In a controlled prospective trial, 36 adults (18 HC and 18 with quiescent UC, defined as SCCAI ≤5) underwent a 10-day “run-in” phase, followed by a 5-day introductory “ramping” phase, and a 10-day “full” dietary intervention with UC-TREAT. UC-TREAT is rich in fermentable carbohydrates (providing 35g/day fibre in addition to habitual intake), and includes daily consumption of 5 different fermented foods, 2 types of berries, and a multivitamin supplement. Faecal samples were collected before and after each study phase, in which microbiome (16S rRNA), bacterial load (quantitative PCR), SCFA (GC-FID) and faecal calprotectin (FCAL) were assessed. Gastrointestinal tolerance (GSRS-IBS), disease activity (SCCAI) and dietary intake were assessed throughout the study. Results Fibre intake doubled during UC-TREAT (9.8 vs 20.8g/1000kcal/day, p < 0.001) and fermented food consumption increased by 4.3 portions/d (p < 0.001) in all participants. In both participant groups, an increase was observed in faecal acetate [median (Q1:Q3) µmol/g: UC: +11.1 (-3.73, 21.5); HC: +15.2 (-0.57, 36.6), both p < 0.01], total SCFA [UC: +11.6 (2.38, 22.1) µmol/g, p = 0.006; HC: +23.1 (-0.76, 53.2), p = 0.015], and bacterial load [log10 16S rRNA gene copies/g, UC: +0.07 (0, 0.22), p = 0.03; HC: +0.06 (-0.04, 0.14), p = 0.07]. Butyrate also increased in UC participants [+2.79 (-0.75, 4.88) µmol/g, p = 0.03). UC participants reported a short-term increase in bloating [median score: +2 (0, 4.3), p = 0.012], while HC reported prolonged bloating [+2.5 (1, 3), p = 0.001] and a transient rise in constipation [+1 (0, 3), p = 0.03] and satiety [0 (0, 1), p = 0.03]. Disease activity score increased [0 (0, 1), p = 0.012], while all UC participants remained in clinical remission and FCAL remained unchanged in UC, but decreased in HC [-3.15 (-10.3, 0.71) mg/kg, p = 0.02]. Microbiome composition changed in UC patients (R2=1.2% p < 0.01), but not in HC; Abundance of Streptococcus, and Anaerostipes hadrus, a butyrate producer, increased in UC (p < 0.001). Conclusion UC-TREAT increased fibre-originating faecal SCFA, bacterial load, and SCFA-producing taxa, without negatively affecting FCAL or GI tolerance in quiescent UC. These proof-of-concept results should be replicated in a larger, well-controlled RCT. Conflict of interest: Ms. Mckirdy, Shona: No conflict of interest Gaya, Daniel: No conflict of interest Russell, Richard K.: Grant: Nestec Other: Abbvie, Celltrion, Janssen, Lilly, Nestle, Pharmacosmos, Pfizer Hansen, Richard: Personal Fees: Dr Hansen has received consultancy fees and travel support from 4D pharma. Macdonald, Jonathan: No conflict of interest Seenan, John Paul: No conflict of interest Nichols, Ben: No conflict of interest Koutsos, Athanasios: No conflict of interest Gerasimidis, Konstantinos: Grant: Nestle Health Science, Nutricia-Danone, Mylan Personal Fees: Abbott, Baxter, Nestle Health Science, Nutricia-Danone, Servier, Janssen
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mckirdy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: