PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2026Journal of Eye Movement Research0 citationsOpen Access

Inspecting the Retina: Oculomotor Patterns and Accuracy in Fundus Image Interpretation by Novice Versus Experienced Eye Care Practitioners

View Full Paper
SUSuraj Upadhyaya

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess how expertise influences eye-tracking strategies and diagnostic accuracy during fundus image interpretation.
  • Compared eye-tracking strategies of novices and experienced optometrists while viewing fundus images.
  • Recorded eye movements using an Eyelink1000 Plus gaze tracker at 2000 Hz.
  • Analyzed diagnostic accuracy and visual search patterns based on statistical methods.
  • Experienced practitioners showed higher diagnostic accuracy (83 ± 6.3%) compared to novices (70 ± 12.9%).
  • Significant differences were found in median latency of eye movements (p < 0.001).
  • No significant differences in median peak velocity (p = 0.11) or laterality accuracy (p = 0.97).
  • Diagnostic accuracy was positively correlated with fixation count in novices (r = 0.54, p < 0.001).
  • Laterality accuracy negatively correlated with total dwelling time (r = -0.62, p < 0.005).

Abstract

Visual search behavior, influenced by expertise, prior knowledge, training, and visual fatigue, is crucial in ophthalmic diagnostics. This study investigates differences in eye-tracking strategies between novice and experienced eye care practitioners during fundus image interpretation. Forty-seven participants, including 37 novices (first- to fourth-year optometry students) and 10 experienced optometrists (≥2 years of experience), viewed 20 fundus images (10 normal, 10 abnormal) while their eye movements were recorded using an Eyelink1000 Plus gaze tracker (2000 Hz). Diagnostic and laterality accuracy were assessed, and statistical analyses were conducted using Sigma Plot 12.0. Results showed that experienced practitioners had significantly higher diagnostic accuracy (83 ± 6.3%) than novices (70 ± 12.9%, p < 0.005). Significant differences in oculomotor behavior were observed, including median latency (p < 0.001), while no significant differences were found in median peak velocity (p = 0.11) or laterality accuracy (p = 0.97). Diagnostic accuracy correlated with fixation count in novices (r = 0.54, p < 0.001), while laterality accuracy correlated with total dwelling time (r = −0.62, p < 0.005). The experienced practitioners demonstrated systematic and focused visual search patterns, whereas the novices exhibited unorganized scan paths. Enhancing training with visual feedback could improve fundus image analysis accuracy in novice clinicians.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Suraj Upadhyaya (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69730f59c8125b09b0d1f310https://doi.org/10.3390/jemr19010011
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Automated Insight Tool: Analyzing Eye Tracking Data of Expert and Novice Radiologists During Optic Disc Detection Task2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Eye-tracking metrics to compare visual attention in prosthodontic preclinical evaluations2025
  3. 3Visual Cue Processing and Scanning Efficiency in Decision-Making of Expert and Novice Nurses During Rapid Patient Deterioration2025
  4. 4The Effect of Experience on the Detection of Small Eye Movements2000
  5. 5Gaze Characteristics Using a Three-Dimensional Heads-Up Display During Cataract Surgery2025