This article explores how AI connects humans and devices into a global brain network, implying ethical challenges.
This article advances the Global Brain Argument, contending that escalating hyperintelligent AI systems, from savant-level LLMs to superintelligences, will connect human users, cloud platforms and the internet-of-things to form one or more emergent global brain networks—planetary scale complex adaptive systems that process information, evolve goals and exhibit agential behaviors. I analyse the premises of the argument, contrast the notion of AGI with my notions of savant and hyperintelligent systems, and defend the claim that many humans are becoming d-nodes in a global brain network. I then raise the AI Megasystem Control Problem: the problem of how disparate proprietary AI services may self-organize into opaque, weakly emergent megasystems that elude traditional AI alignment techniques. I also delve into the ethical implications of the argument, such as surveillance capitalism, epistemic manipulation and dual-use risks and discuss the relationship between the argument and the extended mind hypothesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Susan Schneider (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: