PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2026International Journal of Clinical Oncology4 citationsOpen Access

Pan-Asian subgroup analysis of EV-302/KEYNOTE-A39: a phase 3 study to evaluate enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab in patients with untreated advanced urothelial carcinoma

View Full Paper
EKEiji KikuchiMHMichiel S. Van der HeijdenBVBegoña P. Valderrama

Key Points

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of enfortumab vedotin combined with pembrolizumab in prolonging overall survival and progression-free survival in Asian patients with untreated advanced urothelial carcinoma.
  • Conducted a post hoc analysis of the phase 3 EV-302 study.
  • Included patients from China, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, and Thailand.
  • Compared treatment of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab with chemotherapy (gemcitabine and cisplatin/carboplatin).
  • Primary endpoints were progression-free survival and overall survival.
  • EV + P prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival compared to chemotherapy.
  • Reduced risk of disease progression or death by 63% (hazard ratio 0.37).
  • Reduced risk of death by 67% (hazard ratio 0.33).
  • Confirmed objective response rate of 72.2% for EV + P versus 35.0% for chemotherapy.
  • No new safety signals were observed in patients receiving EV + P.

Abstract

Abstract Background In the phase 3 EV-302 study, enfortumab vedotin–pembrolizumab (EV + P) significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) versus chemotherapy in patients with untreated locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC). We present a post hoc analysis in a pan-Asian population. Methods Patients from China, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, and Thailand received 3-week cycles of EV (1.25 mg/kg; intravenously; Days 1 and 8) plus P (200 mg; intravenously; Day 1) or chemotherapy (gemcitabine Days 1 and 8 plus cisplatin/carboplatin Day 1). Primary endpoints were PFS and OS. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) and safety. Results Overall, 176 patients were included (EV + P, n = 94; chemotherapy, n = 82). Median follow-up was 28.9 months for EV + P recipients and 26.6 months for chemotherapy recipients. EV + P prolonged PFS and OS versus chemotherapy, reducing the risk of disease progression or death by 63% (hazard ratio HR, 0.37; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.24–0.57) and death by 67% (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.20–0.54), respectively. Confirmed ORR was 72.2% versus 35.0%. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 66.0% of EV + P recipients and 68.4% of chemotherapy recipients. Most commonly maculopapular rash (11.7%) and hyperglycemia (10.6%) for EV + P and neutropenia (25.0%), anemia (19.7%), and neutrophil count decreased (18.4%) for chemotherapy. Conclusion EV + P demonstrated a clinically meaningful survival benefit in Asian patients with untreated la/mUC, with no new safety signals observed, consistent with the global EV-302 study. Results support guideline recommendations for EV + P as preferred first-line therapy in la/mUC. Clinical trial registration NCT04223856 (registered January 8, 2020). Graphical abstract

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kikuchi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69730f9fc8125b09b0d1f539https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02950-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper