PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2026Animals0 citationsOpen Access

Evaluation of Different Terrestrial Oils as an Alternative to Dietary Fish Oil on Feed Physical Properties, Growth, Feed Utilization, and Fatty Acid Profile of Gangetic Catfish (Mystus cavasius)

View Full Paper
SHSadia Taslim HelenTDTanwi DeyABAnwesha Bharoteshwari

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of replacing dietary fish oil with terrestrial oils in Gangetic catfish diets.
  • Conducted a 70-day feeding experiment with five different diets for Gangetic catfish.
  • Formulated diets included fish meal and variations of fish oil replacements: soybean oil, black soldier fly larvae oil, palm oil, mixed oils.
  • 675 fish were distributed in 15 aquariums and fed to satiation twice daily.
  • Measured growth, feed utilization, and fatty acid composition.
  • Fish fed with mixed oil (D5) had the highest growth rates.
  • Feed conversion ratios, feed conversion efficiency, and protein efficiency ratio were not significantly affected by oil source.
  • The fatty acid profile varied significantly across groups, with D1 showing the highest n-3 LC-PUFA content.
  • Pellet durability and water stability were highest in diets containing soybean oil and mixed oils.

Abstract

The global demand for fish oil (FO) is increasing while its supply is decreasing, which has limited its use in aquafeeds. Research on alternative terrestrial oils (TOs) for commonly cultured fish species in Bangladesh is limited. This research involved a 70-day feeding experiment to assess the effectiveness of replacing FO with TOs in the diet of Gangetic catfish (Mystus cavasius). Five diets were formulated: a control diet (D1) with fish meal and FO, and four diets replacing FO with soybean oil (D2), black soldier fly larvae oil (D3), palm oil (D4), or a mixed oil combination (D5) of 50% black soldier fly larvae oil, 25% soybean oil, and 25% palm oil. A total of 675 fish (0.5 g each) were distributed in 15 100 L aquariums (45 fish/aquarium) and fed to satiation twice daily. Fish fed with Diet D5 showed significantly higher growth, followed by those fed with D3, D4, and D1, while D2 resulted in significantly lower growth. Fish on the D5 diet consumed the most feed, followed by those on the D3 and D2 diets, with similar feed intake levels for those on the D1 and D4 diets. FCR, FCE, and PER were not significantly affected by dietary oil sources. Whole-body lipid content (p < 0.05) was significantly lower in the D3 group and higher in the D2 group, while other groups showed intermediate values. The fatty acid composition in the fish reflected their diets: significantly higher n-3 LC-PUFA (EPA + DHA) content was observed in the D1 group, followed by the D4 and D3 groups, and fish fed with D2 and D5 showed significantly lower values. Alpha-linolenic acid C18:3n-3) was significantly higher in the D2 group, followed by the D3, D1, and D4 groups, with the D5 group having a significantly lower value. Total MUFA was significantly higher in D4, followed by D1, D5, and D3; the D2-fed group showed a significantly lower value. Lauric acid (C12:0) was significantly higher in D3, followed by D5; other groups showed significantly lower values. Feed physical properties were significantly influenced by oil type, with water stability, pellet durability, and palatability being significantly highest in the D2 and D5 diets, followed by D3 and D4, with D1 being the lowest. Fish on the D1 and D5 diets had a significantly higher condition factor (CF) compared to fish on the D2 diet. Considering the growth and overall performance in the current study, we concluded that under the current dietary composition, TOs can effectively replace FO in the diets of Gangetic catfish, with mixed oils, black soldier fly larvae oil, and palm oil being the most promising alternatives.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Helen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69730f9fc8125b09b0d1f6d7https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16020330
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper