Prospective cohort study shows favorable long-term outcomes of Kono-S anastomosis in children with Crohn’s disease, suggesting low recurrence rates.
Background Children with Crohn’s disease (CD) frequently undergo ileocaecal resection (ICR), and anastomotic recurrence is common. In adults, published results on the Kono-S anastomosis are mixed. Evidence on how anastomotic configuration affects recurrence in paediatric patients remains scarce. We aimed to report single-centre outcomes of laparoscopically assisted Kono-S in children, focusing on long-term safety and on endoscopic and surgical recurrence. Methods We conducted a single-centre prospective observational cohort including all consecutive paediatric CD patients (N = 25) undergoing single-port laparoscopically assisted ICR with Kono-S between August 2022 and September 2025. Data were collected prospectively in a predefined institutional database, including demographics, perioperative parameters, complications (Clavien–Dindo), and endoscopic follow-up. Endoscopic recurrence was defined as Rutgeerts ≥i2. Results are reported as median (Q1–Q3) or n (%). Results Median age at surgery was 16.9 years (13.8–17.6); 13 (52%) were male. Paris classification: B2 in 13 (52%), B3 in 12 (48%). Procedures were elective in 14 (56%) and subacute in 11 (44%). Biologic therapy was used in 24/25 (96%); among treated patients, the interval from last dose to surgery was 7 days (3–14). Operative time was 170 min (152–203); Kono-S creation 56 min (50–64); length of stay 6 days (5–7). No ≥Clavien–Dindo complications occurred. Endoscopy was performed in 19/25 (76%) at 6 months (5–6): endoscopic recurrence (Ri ≥ 2) 5/19 (26%). No surgical recurrence was observed. Median follow-up was 29 months (11–33). Conclusion In this prospectively collected single-centre cohort, laparoscopically assisted Kono-S showed excellent short-term safety and low endoscopic recurrence with no surgical recurrence at follow-up. These findings suggest favourable outcomes in children and warrant confirmation in larger multicentre cohorts. Conflict of interest: Dr. Dotlacil, Vojtech: No conflict of interest Zarubova, Kristyna: No conflict of interest Mitrova, Katarina: Lecture fees/consultancy: Abbvie, Janssen, Eli-Lilly Schwarz, Jan: No conflict of interest Hradsky, Ondrej: Lectures/congress fees/consultancy from MSD, AbbVie, Takeda, Sandoz, Nutricia, Ferring, Pfizer, and Lilly. Skaba, Richard: No conflict of interest Bronsky, Jiri: Personal Fees: AbbVie, MSD, Nutricia, Nestlé Non-financial Support: AbbVie, MSD, Nutricia, Nestlé Rygl, Michal: No conflict of interest
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dotlačil et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: