PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2026ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information2 citationsOpen Access

Altitudinal Gradient and Influencing Factors of Carbon Storage in the Gonghe Basin of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau

View Full Paper
ASAiling SunXXXingsheng XiaLHLiming He

Key Points

  • The study aims to examine how altitudinal gradients affect carbon storage dynamics in the Gonghe Basin from 2000 to 2020.
  • Utilized land use and digital elevation model (DEM) data to analyze carbon storage dynamics.
  • Employed the InVEST model and Geoda for spatial analysis.
  • Integrated a geographical detector to identify influencing factors on carbon storage.
  • Carbon storage showed higher values at mid-elevations (2800–4400 m) and lower at summit and valley zones.
  • Strong interactions between vegetation cover, precipitation, and human activity were observed, particularly in the low-elevation zone.
  • Human factors like GDP density and land-use intensity increasingly influenced carbon storage over time across all elevations.

Abstract

Investigating the spatial distribution and dynamics of terrestrial carbon storage is vital for climate change mitigation. However, horizontal spatial analyses often overlook heterogeneity in complex terrains. Here, we focused on the Gonghe Basin on the northeastern margin of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau, where resource exploitation and ecological conservation interact. By using land use and DEM data and integrating the InVEST model, Geoda, and a geographical detector, we showed the altitudinal gradient effect and spatiotemporal evolution of carbon storage in the Gonghe Basin from 2000 to 2020 and identified the key factors influencing these patterns. Results show the following: (1) From 2000 to 2020, carbon storage in the Gonghe Basin exhibited a distinct pattern of “high at mid-elevations, low at both summit and valley” along the elevation gradient. High-value areas were concentrated in the forest–grassland zone between 2800–4400 m, while low-value areas were distributed in the human activity-intensive zone of 2100–2800 m and the alpine desert zone of 4400–5000 m. (2) The synergistic drivers of carbon storage differed markedly across elevation gradients. The low-elevation zone (2100–2800 m) was characterized by strengthened interactions between vegetation cover and precipitation as well as human activity variables, indicating a coupled natural–anthropogenic driving regime. In the mid-elevation zone (2800–4400 m), interactive effects shifted from vegetation–natural factor coupling to enhanced synergy with social factors such as population density. In the high-elevation zone (4400–5000 m), stable long-term interactions between vegetation and temperature predominated, while sensitivity to interactions involving human activity factors increased. (3) Although natural factors remained dominant, the explanatory power of human activity factors—including GDP density, land-use intensity, and grazing intensity—increased over time across all elevation gradients, suggesting progressively stronger human intervention in carbon cycling. (4) Based on these findings, this study proposes a “three belts–three strategies” synergistic governance framework—“regulation and restoration” for the low-elevation belt, “conservation and efficiency enhancement” for the mid-elevation belt, and “monitoring and early warning” for the high-elevation belt—aiming to enhance regional carbon sink capacity and ecological resilience through zone-specific, targeted interventions. These findings offer a scientific basis for reinforcing regional ecological security and improving carbon sink management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69730fe2c8125b09b0d1f977https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi15010048
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Patterns and Dominant Driving Factors of Carbon Storage Changes in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau under Multiple Land Use Change Scenarios2024 · 13 citations
  2. 2Spatiotemporal Distribution and Driving Factors of Carbon Storage in the Ecologically Fragile Alpine Region of the Eastern Qinghai–Tibet Plateau2026
  3. 3Evaluation and Prediction of Carbon Storage in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau by Coupling the GMMOP and PLUS Models2024 · 9 citations
  4. 4Long-Term Spatiotemporal Patterns and Driving Mechanisms of Net Ecosystem Productivity on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau Based on the Optimal Multivariate-Stratification Geographical Detector Model2026
  5. 5Spatio-Temporal Variations and Drivers of Carbon Storage in the Tibetan Plateau under SSP-RCP Scenarios Based on the PLUS-InVEST-GeoDetector Model2024 · 6 citations