PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2026Apmis3 citations

Cefepime/Enmetazobactam as a Carbapenem‐Sparing Alternative: Activity Against Extended‐Spectrum β‐Lactamase‐Producing Enterobacteria With and Without Carbapenemases in Southern Spain

View Full Paper
LCLeticia Castellano‐SánchezMAMaría Aguilera‐FrancoMAManuel Albendín‐Moreno

Key Points

  • To assess Cefepime/enmetazobactam's efficacy against ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae compared to other treatments.
  • Evaluated 150 ESBL-, KPC-, and OXA-48-producing strains.
  • Isolates collected from urine and rectal cultures between January 2022 and June 2024.
  • Resistance rates to piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem, and Cefepime/enmetazobactam were compared.
  • Cefepime/enmetazobactam showed only 4.67% resistance among all β-lactamase-producing bacteria.
  • For ESBL and OXA-48 producers, resistance rates were significantly lower for FEP/META compared to PIP/TAZ and MER.
  • All KPC producers were resistant to PIP/TAZ and FEP/META, highlighting a therapeutic challenge.

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study aims to evaluate the activity of Cefepime/enmetazobactam (FEP/META) in a Regional Hospital in southern Spain, against a collection of ESBL‐producing Enterobacteriaceae with or without carbapenemases, comparing it with piperacillin/tazobactam (PIP/TAZ) and meropenem (MER). A total of 150 ESBL‐, KPC‐, and OXA‐48‐producing strains were selected, excluding those producing metallo‐β‐lactamases. Of these isolates, 117 (78%) were from urine cultures and 33 (22%) from rectal colonization surveillance cultures. Isolates were collected between January 1, 2022, and June 30, 2024. Overall, 23% of ESBL‐producers were resistant to PIP/TAZ. Similarly, 30% of OXA‐48 producers were resistant to PIP/TAZ. FEP/META was the most active agent (7.1% of resistance) against ESBL and OXA‐48 producers' strains. KPC‐producers were all resistant to PIP/TAZ and FEP/META, while 66.7% were resistant to MER. Considering the total group of β‐lactamase‐producing bacteria, 48.67% were resistant to PIP/TAZ, compared to 6.67% to MER and 4.67% to FEP/META ( p value < 0.0001). Pairwise comparisons showed significant differences between FEP/META and PIP/TAZ, as well as between PIP/TAZ and MER ( p < 0.0001). FEP/META represents a promising therapeutic option for the treatment of infections caused by Gram‐negative bacteria resistant to third‐generation cephalosporins. It could also be an alternative to OXA‐48 carbapenemase‐producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Castellano‐Sánchez et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69730fe2c8125b09b0d1f98chttps://doi.org/10.1111/apm.70146
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper