This analysis demonstrates improved option pricing with a novel model in the context of ETF returns, indicating greater accuracy.
Modeling stock returns and option pricing in the presence of jumps remains a central challenge in financial economics. This paper employs a novel score-driven GARCH-jump model to analyze SSE (Shanghai Stock Exchange) 50 ETF returns and option pricing. The main findings are as follows. First, we use 50 ETF spot returns to estimate conditional volatility and jump intensity, and find that the SDSDJ (score-driven separate dynamic jumps) model significantly outperforms conventional GARCH-jump models in model fitting. Second, we evaluate both in-sample and out-of-sample pricing performance using data from 50 ETF options, and find that the SDSDJ model achieves the lowest in-sample pricing error among all benchmarks, while its simplified variant—the SDJ (score-driven jumps) model—delivers the most accurate out-of-sample results. Third, the superior pricing performance of both models is robust across different levels of moneyness and DTM (days-to-maturity).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: