PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2026Water2 citationsOpen Access

Spatiotemporal Evolution of Compound Dry–Hot Events and Their Impacts on Vegetation Net Primary Productivity in the Yangtze River Basin

View Full Paper
HXHongqi XiGZGengxi ZhangHWHongkai Wang

Key Points

  • This research examines how compound dry-hot events affect vegetation productivity in the Yangtze River Basin under climate change.
  • Utilized ERA5-Land and MODIS data from 2002-2024
  • Developed a Copula-based standardized compound dry-hot index (SCDHI)
  • Conducted trend and correlation analyses for NPP sensitivity and lag
  • Created an NPP-SCDHI coupling framework for assessing vegetation resilience
  • Basin-wide monthly NPP slightly increased while SCDHI decreased, indicating a warming and drying trend
  • NPP negatively correlated with event intensity in the upper basin, but positively in the middle-lower plains
  • Mean NPP response time was about 2 months
  • Forests displayed high resistance but limited recovery; shrublands had moderate resistance and low resilience; cultivated vegetation showed the lowest resistance and weak resilience

Abstract

Compound dry–hot events increasingly threaten ecosystem productivity under global warming. Using ERA5-Land and MODIS NPP (2002–2024) for the Yangtze River Basin, we built climate indices and developed a Copula-based standardized compound dry–hot index (SCDHI) to detect events and examine spatiotemporal patterns. Trend and correlation analyses quantified NPP sensitivity and lag, and an NPP–SCDHI coupling framework assessed resistance and resilience across major vegetation types. Basin-wide monthly NPP increased slightly, while SCDHI decreased, indicating a warmer and drier tendency. Under dry–hot conditions, NPP was mainly negatively related to event intensity in the upper basin but positively related across much of the middle–lower plains. The mean NPP response time was approximately 2 months, with forests and croplands typically lagging 2–3 months. Under extreme stress, forests showed high resistance but limited recovery, whereas shrublands showed moderate resistance and low resilience. Cultivated vegetation exhibited the lowest resistance and weak resilience, grasslands had low resistance but relatively rapid recovery, and alpine vegetation showed moderate resistance and the highest resilience. Cultivated vegetation and grasslands may therefore represent high-risk types for ecological management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69731005c8125b09b0d1fb1ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/w18020276
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper