PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2026CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics1 citationsOpen Access

Pharmacovigilance Insights Into Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor‐Induced Risk of Paraneoplastic Syndrome: A Large‐Scale Real World Study

View Full Paper
BTBufu TangShanghai Medical College of Fudan UniversityXSXin SongHegang People's HospitalYSYiting SunChina Medical University

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand the risk profiles and clinical features of paraneoplastic syndromes associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
  • Analyzed FAERS data from January 2011 to June 2024 to identify paraneoplastic syndrome cases linked to immune checkpoint inhibitors.
  • Calculated reporting odds ratios (RORs) to evaluate safety signals associated with different ICI regimens.
  • Examined clinical features and outcomes across various ICI treatments.
  • Identified 179 cases of paraneoplastic syndrome among 162,493 ICI-related adverse event reports.
  • Significant reporting of paraneoplastic syndrome primarily linked to PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors and combination therapies with high RORs.
  • Median time to onset of paraneoplastic syndrome was 6 days, with 42.31% occurring within 30 days post-treatment initiation.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)‐associated paraneoplastic syndromes (PS) represent a rare but potentially life‐threatening adverse event. Despite the widespread use of ICIs in cancer treatment, the clinical characteristics and risk profiles of PS across different treatment regimens remain incompletely characterized. Methods We analyzed FAERS data (Jan 2011–Jun 2024) to identify PS cases potentially related to ICI use. Reporting odds ratios (RORs) were calculated to evaluate safety signals. Clinical features, time‐to‐onset, and outcomes were analyzed across different ICI regimens. Results Among 162,493 ICI‐associated adverse event reports, 179 PS cases were identified. Disproportionate reporting of PS was observed with PD‐1 inhibitors (ROR 21.77, 95% CI 16.36–28.97), PD‐L1 inhibitors (ROR 23.33, 95% CI 14.13–38.41), nivolumab plus ipilimumab (ROR 24.21, 95% CI 18.07–32.42), and durvalumab plus tremelimumab (ROR 24.55, 95% CI 18.73–32.79). PS onset showed a bimodal distribution, with a median time to onset of 6 days, where 42.31% occurring within 30 days and 23.08% after 360 days of treatment initiation. Combination therapy, particularly durvalumab plus tremelimumab, was associated with higher rates of severe outcomes (27.8%). In patients with PS related to ICI therapy, those with lung malignancies are the most commonly represented group. Conclusions This analysis reveals distinct temporal patterns and safety signals of ICI‐associated PS, with higher reporting rates and severity in combination therapy. These findings provide important insights for clinical monitoring strategies and highlight the need for increased vigilance during specific risk windows, particularly in patients receiving combination therapy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69731005c8125b09b0d1fc52https://doi.org/10.1002/cns.70747
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper