Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reveals the financial inclusion gap in 45 countries, indicating necessary reforms for better access.
Research on financial inclusion has primarily focused on the supply of financial services, often overlooking the behavioural, institutional and social factors that influence individuals' participation in the financial system. Drawing on behavioural economics, social capital and institutional theories, this study proposes a dual analytical framework to measure the supply and demand of financial inclusion separately. Using principal component analysis on Global Findex and IMF Financial Access Survey data for 45 countries in 2021, we calculate a financial inclusion gap to capture the structural mismatch between the provision of financial services and their usage. Fractional logit regression analysis reveals that economic conditions, governance quality and digital infrastructure are the principal predictors of the financial inclusion gap. In contrast, liquidity, resilience, social trust, religious norms and financial literacy are the main determinants of persistent demand‐side exclusion. These findings highlight persistent structural and socio‐economic asymmetries that result in unequal inclusion across countries. The policy implications suggest a gradual approach to reform, beginning with digital and infrastructural expansion, followed by improvements in governance and social inclusion measures, to reduce misalignments between supply and demand and promote more sustainable and inclusive financial systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jellouli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: