Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Quality improvement initiative increases awareness of long-term follow-up care in pediatric cancer survivors, indicating a need for widespread implementation.
Less than half of childhood cancer survivors adhere to recommended follow-up care. We implemented an educational intervention to assess and improve their awareness of long-term follow-up care in pediatric solid and brain tumor survivors or caregivers, using quality improvement methodology. We assessed knowledge of the length of follow-up needed, reasons for recommended lifelong follow-up, and patient-specific late effects. The process was repeated over 3 consecutive visits to assess changes from baseline. Fifty-two patients underwent baseline visits. Twenty-four (22 caregivers, 92%) had 3 visits with the same respondent. From the first to third visit (median: 9.5, range: 6 to 16 mo), correct responses for follow-up duration increased from 29% to 88% ( P <0.001), and for naming at least 2 late effects increased from 71% to 96% ( P =0.04). Forty-five percent reported subjective anxiety after discussion about late effects at the first visit, and 54% rated their anxiety >5 on the 10-point scale. Anxiety levels remained unchanged over time. A structured educational intervention increased awareness of lifelong follow-up care while causing unintended subjective anxiety in cancer survivor caregivers. Comprehensive implementation of this intervention could potentially improve poor long-term follow-up rates in pediatric cancer survivors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aguilar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: