Research investigates vortex and shear stress dynamics in swirling flow for agricultural irrigation, suggesting improvements in efficiency.
To investigate the spatiotemporal dynamics and wall shear stress patterns of a PVC (precessing vortex core) within a bounded swirling flow for agricultural irrigation, LES (Large Eddy Simulation) simulations based on a guide-vane hydro-cyclone were conducted and validated by physical experiments. Coherent structures were extracted through flow modal decomposition, and a reduced-order model was established. The modal analysis of the flow reveals the following: A modal pairing phenomenon exists in the swirling flow, starting from the swirling section downstream of the guide-vane. The flow converts from a basic pipe flow to swirling flow. Compared to the vane section, the composite PVC in the swirling section exhibits mutual momentum exchange, leading to increasingly fragmented evolution of the vortex core over time and space. The application of vortex identification criteria to the reconstructed reduced-order model reveal that the precessing vortex core exhibits a tendency to spiral downstream along the guide-vane twist direction, with its rotation direction perfectly aligned with the guide-vane twist. As the Reynolds number of the bounded swirling flow increases, the circumferential precession of the PVC exhibits a linear weakening trend. As the relative length l/d of the guide-vane to the pipe increases, the circumferential precession of the PVC shows a linear strengthening trend. The wall shear stress analysis results indicate that the stress coefficient magnitude near the downstream location of the guide-vane is approximately zero, representing the lowest value across the entire flow. The region exhibits a rotational precession trend downstream. The stress coefficient magnitude between guide-vanes is relatively high, about 0.1 times dynamic pressure of approaching flow, and this trend also develops downstream with a rotational precession tendency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: